Zipline Application Paths
All applications submitted in Zipline follow one of three review paths. Selecting the correct path before starting your application helps avoid delays and rework.
If you are unsure which path applies to your study, consult HSD by emailing hsdrely@uw.edu before starting.
Option 1: ÌìÃÀÓ°ÔºReviewing for ÌìÃÀÓ°ÔºOnly
Choose this option if:
- The research may be exempt (HSD must make this determination), and/or
- The research involves only the ÌìÃÀÓ°Ôº, or
- Other institutions are involved, but ÌìÃÀÓ°Ôºwill not review on their behalf (for example, the ÌìÃÀÓ°ÔºIRB generally does not review for the VA).
Key points:
Next step:
Option 2: ÌìÃÀÓ°ÔºReviewing for Other Institutions
Choose this option if:
Key points:
- HSD must agree in advance to review for other institutions and establish reliance agreements
- Approval under this path does not approve all sites at once
- Each relying institution goes through a separate site review and receives a separate site approval
Common examples:
- ÌìÃÀÓ°Ôºis the primary recipient of a federal award for a multi site NIH grant
- Collaborations with local partners (e.g., Seattle Children’s or Fred Hutch) where ÌìÃÀÓ°Ôºis the primary awardee
- International studies where ÌìÃÀÓ°Ôºis the primary recipient of a federal award
Next steps:
Option 3: Non-ÌìÃÀÓ°ÔºIRB Reviewing
Choose this option if:
- The research requires IRB review and
- ÌìÃÀÓ°Ôºshould not serve as the reviewing IRB.
Key points:
- HSD must agree in advance to cede IRB review and establish reliance agreements
Common examples:
- An external IRB is designated by the sponsor
- The study is industry sponsored
- ÌìÃÀÓ°Ôºis participating as a relying site in a multi site study
Next steps: